Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/832/2026 of RANJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER on 26 August 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 273 RANJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral) 1. under Sections Station Sadar Ludhiana, District Ludhiana, proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise
IN
RANJIT SIN
STATE OF
CORAM: H
Present:
Shalini Sing
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. under Sectio Station Sad proceedings 09.12.2025.
2. learned trial regard to com
THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIGA
NGH AND ANOTHER VERSUS
PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Mr. Bisman Mann, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Bareen Pratap Singh, AAG,
Mr. Simranjit Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2.
*** gh Nagpal, J. (Oral) Petitioners seek quashing of F ons 447, 511, 427, 188 and 34 dar Ludhiana, District Ludh arising therefrom, on the On 13.01.2026, this Court direc Court/Illaqa Magistrate for rec mpromise dated 09.12.2025.
NJAB AND HARYANA ARH CRM-M-832-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 26.08.2026
…PETITIONERS
...RESPONDENTS LINI SINGH NAGPAL , Punjab. FIR No.0061 dated 19.05.2020 4 of Indian Penal Code, Police hiana, and all consequential basis of compromise dated cted the parties to appear before cording of their statements with e l d e h JYOTI
3. learned Judic of Investigati Learned Judi recording sa compromise has been sub p L
4. factum of c continuation
In compliance of the aforesaid cial Magistrate, First Class, Lud ing Officer ASI Saaraj Kumar w icial Magistrate, First Class, Lu atisfaction that all the partie without any influence or coerc mitted: “1. There are two persons nam Singh who are arraigned as ac report. Both the accused have regard to compromise. None proclaimed person in the presen
2. There is only one complaina made his statement with regard
3. The present case is pendin evidence.
4. The compromise is genuine an the parties.
5. The accused Ranjit Singh is i no.45/2021 under Section 447, Ludhiana.” Learned State counsel has not r compromise. Since the matter of the criminal proceedings w
d order, parties appeared before dhiana on 17.01.2026. Statement was also recorded on 12.03.2026. udhiana has submitted his report es have entered into a valid cion. Point-wise report as under mely Gurmeet Singh and Ranjit ccused in the present FIR/police made their joint statement with of the accused is declared as nt case. ant namely Anil Kumar who has to compromise. ng at the stage of prosecution nd voluntarily executed between involved in another FIR bearing 379, 511, 201 IPC, PS Sadar raised any dispute regarding the has been amicably resolved, would be an exercise in futility. e t . t d r t e h s s n n g r e , . JYOTI
Criminal ant decline quash
5. Judgment of and another “Gian Singh petition is all
6. 188 and 34 Ludhiana, an qua the petiti
7. 26.08.2026 Jyoti-V
tecedents of the accused canno hing of proceedings in the FIR. Following principles of law l this Court in “Kulwinder Singh ” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 h Versus State of Punjab and o lowed. FIR No.0061 dated 19.05.2020 of Indian Penal Code, Police S nd all consequential proceedings ioners, on the basis of compromi Pending applications, if any, stan
Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable :
ot be the sole consideration to laid down by the Full Bench h and others Vs. State of Punjab 2 and Hon’ble Supreme Court in others”(2012) 10 SCC 303, the 0 under Sections 447, 511, 427, Station Sadar Ludhiana, District s arising therefrom, are quashed ise dated 09.12.2025. nd disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No o h b n e , t d
) JYOTI