Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/51171/2023 of SOURAV KASHYAP Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 26 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 130 CRM-M-51171-2023 Date of Decision:- 26.08.2026 SOURAV KASHYAP ......PETITIONER VS. STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Hitesh Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Toor, AAG Punjab.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-51171-2023

Date of Decision:- 26.08.2026

SOURAV KASHYAP

......PETITIONER

VS.

STATE OF PUNJAB

.....RESPONDENT

CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE

JASJIT SINGH BEDI

Present:

Mr. Hitesh Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. M.S. Toor, AAG Punjab.

****

JASJIT SINGH BEDI

, J.(ORAL

)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. On 10.10.2023, the following order was passed:- “Aggrieved against the order dated 29.04.2023 passed by JMIC, counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter already stands compromised. The parties approached this Court vide CRM-M-35749- 2019, wherein the said compromise was propounded. However, the same was declined on the ground that the petitioner was declared ‘proclaimed offender’ on 13.08.2018. In fact, after the petitioner was declared proclaimed offender, he appeared before the trial Court and the matter was compromised. However, the said fact could not be brought to the notice of this Court in view of the fact that none appeared before this Court on 22.11.2022. Notice of motion, returnable for 16.01.2024. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf the respondent-State. KUSUM 2026.08.27 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh

CRM-M-51171-2023

In the meantime, operation of the impugned order dated 29.04.2023 (Annexure P-8) shall remain stayed subject to the petitioner appearing before the trial Court on or before 20.10.2023.”

2. In deference to the aforementioned order, the petitioner has appeared before the Court of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Pathankot and is continuously appearing therein.

3. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court, at this stage.

4. Disposed of.

5. It is expected that the petitioner shall not absent himself from the Trial without sufficient cause.

6. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) 26.08.2026 JUDGE Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2026.08.27 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead