Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/37721/2026 of GULWINDER SINGH AND ANR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 26 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (214) CRM-M-37721-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 26.08.2026 Gulwinder Singh and anr. ... Petitioners V/s State of Punjab ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Simar Bedi, Advocate, for the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

(214) CRM-M-37721-2026 (O & M)

Date of decision: 26.08.2026 Gulwinder Singh and anr. ... Petitioners V/s State of Punjab

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Simar Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Roshandeep, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Raunaq Singh Aulakh, Advocate, for the complainant.. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI,

J. (Oral)

The petitioners seek the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 (438 Cr.P.C.) in case bearing FIR No.103 dated 30.05.2026 under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 119 and Section 3(5) of BNS, 2023 (Sections 341, 323, 324, 327 and Section 34 IPC) registered at Police Station Dehlon, Ludhiana. On 14.07.2026, this Court had granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioners recording that the injuries attributed to them were simple in nature and the injury attracting Section 326 IPC has been attributed to one Avtar Singh. A status report dated 25.08.2026 filed on behalf of the respondent-State is taken on record. A perusal of the same would reveal that petitioner No2 i.e. Barpur Singh was, in fact, attributed a simple injury SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.08.27 13:32 I agree to specified portions of this document which has now been opined to be the grievous in nature. However, the said injury is on the proximal phalanx of index finger of the left hand. As the petitioners have joined the investigation in terms of the order dated 14.07.2026, as such, their custodial interrogation is not required. In view of the above, the interim order dated 14.07.2026 is made absolute. However, the petitioners shall keep on joining the investigation as and when required to do so and they shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. The petition stands disposed of. August 26, 2026 ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) sukhpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.08.27 13:32 I agree to specified portions of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead