Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/19402/2026 of RAJ KUMAR GARG Vs STATE OF UNION TERROTORY AND ORS on 26 August 2026
-2- 2. Vide order dated 09.04.2026, the affected parties were directed to appear before the learned Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise. 3. Report has since been received from learned District and Sessions Judge,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
POONAM
CRM-M-19402-2026 (O&M)
2. Vide order dated 09.04.2026, the affected parties were directed to appear before the learned Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise.
3. Report has since been received from learned District and Sessions Judge, Chandigarh, in pursuance to the directions of this Court wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report(s) compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the private respondents have also made statement to the effect that they would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioner is quashed.
4. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with its report.
5. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioner and the private respondents are the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question.
6. In view of the report of the learned District & Sessions Judge, Chandigarh, and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed, qua the petitioner, subject to cost of Rs.25,000/- to be deposited with the fund maintained by Chandigarh Spinal Rehab, Plot No.1, POONAM
CRM-M-19402-2026 (O&M)
Sector 28-A, Chandigarh, (Sai Aasra Paraplegic Rehab Centre) Kotak Mahindra Bank, Branch Sector 27 D, Chandigarh, Account No.9612001641, IFSC-KKBK0004201.
7. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 26.08.2026 poonam Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
POONAM