Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/39713/2026 of TEJINDER SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 26 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 221221221221 CRMCRMCRMCRM----MMMM----39713397133971339713----2026202620262026 Date of Decision: 26.08.2026 TEJINDTEJINDTEJINDTEJINDER SINGHER SINGHER SINGHER SINGH ....Petitioner V/s STATE OF PUNJAB ....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM
CRM
CRM
CRM-M-39713
39713-2026
Date of Decision: 26.08.2026
TEJIND
TEJIND
TEJIND
TEJINDER SINGH
ER SINGH
ER SINGH
ER SINGH
....Petitioner
V/s
STATE OF PUNJAB
....Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Mr. Pardeep K. Bajaj, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Sandeep Kumar, DAG, Punjab.
*****
H.
H.
H.
H.S.GREWAL
S.GREWAL
S.GREWAL
S.GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Section 438 Cr.P.C.) for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.85 dated 04.06.2026 registered under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61 of the BNS, 2023 (Corresponding to Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the IPC), at Police Station City Pattti, District Tarn Taran.
2. This Court, vide order dated 21.07.2026, had directed the petitioner to appear before the SHO/Investigating Officer and join investigation and in the event of his arrest, he was ordered to be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS (erstwhile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.).
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 21.07.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined and cooperated with the investigation. POONAM RATHORE 2026.08.27 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM RM RM RM-M-39713
39713-2026
4. Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for further custodial interrogation.
5. Mr.Ribhav Singla, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of the complainant and filed his memo of appearance which is taken on record.
6. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 21.07.2026 is made made made made absolute absolute absolute absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. However, it is clarified that the investigating authority on addition of an offence or offences may not proceed to arrest the accused/petitioner, but for arresting the accused/petitioner on such addition of offence or offences it needs to obtain an order to arrest the accused/petitioners from the Court which had granted the bail in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sumit Vs State of Sumit Vs State of Sumit Vs State of Sumit Vs State of U.P. and Another U.P. and Another U.P. and Another U.P. and Another, Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026 Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026 Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026 Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026, decided on 09.02.2026.
8. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(H.S. GREWAL H.S. GREWAL H.S. GREWAL H.S. GREWAL) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE August 26, 2026 poonam
1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No
2. Whether reportable?
: Yes/No
POONAM RATHORE 2026.08.27 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document