Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/21871/2026 of HARMANPREET SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 26 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 212212212212 CRMCRMCRMCRM----MMMM----21871218712187121871----2026202620262026 Date of Decision: 26.08.2026 HARMANPREET SINGHHARMANPREET SINGHHARMANPREET SINGHHARMANPREET SINGH ....Petitioner V/s STATE OF PUNJABSTATE OF PUNJABSTATE OF PUNJABSTATE OF
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM
CRM
CRM
CRM-M-21871
21871
21871
21871-2026
Date of Decision: 26.08.2026
HARMANPREET SINGH
HARMANPREET SINGH
HARMANPREET SINGH
HARMANPREET SINGH
....Petitioner
V/s
STATE OF PUNJAB
STATE OF PUNJAB
STATE OF PUNJAB
STATE OF PUNJAB
....Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Mr.Sourav Kathpal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Sandeep Kumar, DAG, Punjab.
*****
H.
H.
H.
H.S.GREWAL
S.GREWAL
S.GREWAL
S.GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the FIR has already been quashed against the petitioner.
2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(H.S. GREWAL H.S. GREWAL H.S. GREWAL H.S. GREWAL) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE August 26, 2026 poonam
1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No
2. Whether reportable?
: Yes/No POONAM RATHORE 2026.08.27 11:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document