Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/10285/2026 of SANDEEP Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 26 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10285-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.08.2026 SANDEEP ......... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present : Mr. Harsh Vardhan Shehrawat, Advocate, (Legal Aid

CRWP-10285-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP-10285-2026 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 26.08.2026

SANDEEP

......... Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

..... Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present :

Mr. Harsh Vardhan Shehrawat, Advocate,

(Legal Aid Counsel)

for the petitioner.

Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, Addl. A.G. Haryana.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL

, J. (Oral)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking protection of the life and liberty of the petitioner from respondents No. 5 to 9, who are alleged to be threatening the petitioner for demanding his due wages, as the petitioner had been working with respondents No. 5 to 9.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted representations before the competent authority and would be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No. 3 to consider and decide the same.

3. Notice of motion.

4. Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.

5. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.08.26 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-10285-2026

a direction to respondent No. 3 to consider and decide the representation dated 02.06.2026 (Annexure P-2) submitted by the petitioner and to have the threat perception of the petitioner duly assessed. In case, upon such assessment, any threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner from respondent Nos. 5 to 9 is found, appropriate protection shall be provided to the petitioner in accordance with law.

6. Petition stands disposed of.

7. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 26.08.2026 S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.08.26 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead