Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/45780/2026 of AMIR KHAN Vs STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH on 21 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 206 ***** CRM-M No.45780 of 2026 Date of decision : 21.8.2026 Date of uploading : 21.8.2026 Amir Khan ………….Petitioner Versus State of U.T. Chandigarh …….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
206
*****
CRM-M No.45780 of 2026
Date of decision : 21.8.2026
Date of uploading : 21.8.2026
Amir Khan
………….Petitioner
Versus
State of U.T. Chandigarh
…….Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present: Mr. Simranjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner
---
SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.307 dated 16.12.2018 under Sections 323, 324, 326 and 506 of IPC, registered at Police Station IT Park, Chandigarh.
2. Notice of motion. 2.1 On the strength of advance copy, Mr. Manish Bansal, Public Prosecutor, UT, Chandigarh assisted by Ms. Swadha, Advocate, causes appearance on behalf of the respondent/State.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has brought to the notice of this Court that a bail application has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner before the concerned Sessions Court, Chandigarh, which is still pending ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.08.21 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document adjudication for 24.8.2026.
4. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition in hand at this stage.
5. Ordered accordingly.
6. Needless to say that the withdrawal of the present petition shall not have any bearing on the bail petition/application pending before the concerned Sessions Court, which shall be ratiocinated upon without influence of the present withdrawal.
(SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE 21.8.2026 Ashwanii Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.08.21 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document