Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/37608/2026 of SUNIL KUMAR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 20 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 227 CRM-M-37608-2026(O&M) Date of decision :20.08.2026 SUNIL KUMAR ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .. RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Abhaysheer Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. *** H.S. Grewal,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Date of decision :20.08.2026 SUNIL KUMAR ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB

.. RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Abhaysheer Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

*** H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) CRM-32250-2026 This application has been filed under Section 528 read with Section 483 of BNSS (erstwhile section 482 of Cr.P.C) praying for grant of interim regular bail to the petitioner for a period of three weeks. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the mother of the petitioner is suffering from serious medical ailments and is in urgent need of proper medical treatment, doctor's supervision, and necessary diagnostic tests for further evaluation of her condition. He, therefore, prays that the petitioner be released on interim bail for a short period to enable him to take care of his ailing mother. Notice in the application. Mr. Subhash Godara, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and, on instructions, does not dispute the aforesaid factual position regarding the medical condition RENU RAWAT 2026.08.21 14.28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh of the petitioner's mother. He has filed the custody certificate in the Court today and the same is taken on record. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on interim bail for a period of six weeks, subject to his furnishing the requisite bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Illaqa Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned. The period of interim bail shall commence from the date of his release. The learned trial Court is directed to ensure that the petitioner surrenders before the jail authorities upon completion of the period of interim bail. Main case: Learned counsel for the applicant- petitioner submits that he does not press the instant petition at this stage. In view of the aforesaid submission, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed at this stage. (H.S.GREWAL) 20.08.2026

JUDGE renu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.08.21 14.28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead