Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/28614/2026 of JOGINDER SINGH AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 18 August 2026
High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 284 CRM-M-28614-2026 Date of Decision: 18.08.2026 JOGINDER SINGH AND OTHERS ....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocate the petitioners. Mr. Sunny
CRM-M-28614--2026
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
CRM-M-28614-2026
Date of Decision: 18.08.2026
JOGINDER SINGH AND OTHERS
....PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocate the petitioners.
Mr. Sunny Namdev, AAG, Haryana
Mr. Manvender Chauhan, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.
****
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS (U/s 482 of Cr.P.C.) for quashing of FIR No. 0386 (Annexure P-1) Dated 01.11.2023, under Section 25 of Arms Act, Sections 148, 149, 307, 323, 427, 447, 506 of IPC (191(3), 190, 109, 115(2), 324(4), 329(3), 351(2)/(3) of BNS, 2023), registered at Police station Pehowa, District Kurukshetra, (whereas while presenting challan, section 307 IPC (109 BNS) and 25 of Arm Act has been deleted and section 325 of IPC (117(2) BNS) has been added in the case) along with all consequential proceedings on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-3).
2. This Court vide order dated 20.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.
3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned SDJM, Pehowa and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the RENU RAWAT 2026.08.19 17.50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CRM-M-28614--2026
statements so recorded, learned SDJM, Pehowa has submitted copy of report dated 27.07.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence and in compliance of order dated 20.05.2026 cost has already been paid.
4. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainants have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.
5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.
6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 0386 (Annexure P-1) Dated 01.11.2023, under Section 25 of Arms Act, Sections 148, 149, 307, 323, 427, 447, 506 of IPC (191(3), 190, 109, 115(2), 324(4), 329(3), 351(2)/(3) of BNS, 2023), registered at Police station Pehowa, District Kurukshetra, (whereas while presenting challan section 307 IPC (109 BNS) and 25 of Arm Act has been deleted and section 325 of IPC (117(2) BNS) has been added in the case) along with all consequential proceedings are quashed qua the petitioners on the basis of compromise.
7. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(H.S.GREWAL) 18.08.2026
JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.08.19 17.50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh