Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/25211/2026 of SURENDER AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER on 18 August 2026
High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 280 CRM-M-25211-2026 Date of Decision: 18.08.2026 SURINDER AND OTHERS ....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Narinder Singh Behgal, Advocate the petitioners. Mr. Sunny
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Date of Decision: 18.08.2026
SURINDER AND OTHERS
....PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Mr. Narinder Singh Behgal, Advocate the petitioners.
Mr. Sunny Namdev, AAG, Haryana
****
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Prayer in the present petition filed by the petitioners under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of FIR No.33 dated 13.03.2026 registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Garhi, District Jind alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise by way of an affidavit of respondent No.2 dated 15.04.2026 (Annexure P-2).
2. The Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.
3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned JMIC, Narwana and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned JMIC, Narwana has submitted copy of report dated 29.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between RENU RAWAT 2026.08.21 14.28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence and in compliance of order dated 05.05.2026 cost has already been paid and receipt thereof has been produced in the Court, which is taken on record.
4. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainants have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.
5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.
6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.33 dated 13.03.2026 registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Garhi, District Jind alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed qua the petitioners on the basis of compromise.
7. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(H.S.GREWAL) 18.08.2026
JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.08.21 14.28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh