Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/58909/2022 of GURMEJ SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 13 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 133 CRM-M-58909-2022 Date of Decision: 13.08.2026 Gurmej Singh …Petitioner V/s State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Samuel Gill, Advocate and Mr. Devi Lal, Advocate, for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-58909-2022
Date of Decision: 13.08.2026
Gurmej Singh
…Petitioner
V/s State of Punjab and others
…Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Present: Mr. Samuel Gill, Advocate and
Mr. Devi Lal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG, Punjab. Mr. A.S. Manaise, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
*** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL)
The instant petition preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C. assails the order dated 11.10.2022 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Court of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Fatehgarh Churian imposing proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C upon land measuring 62 kanals 2 marlas (fully described in the impugned order) situated at Berrianwal, P.S. Fatehgarh Churian, District Gurdaspur.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent No.4 submits that after the passing of the impugned order, the eviction petition filed by respondent No.4 stands allowed by the Court of Financial Commissioner (Appeals) vide order dated 27.03.2026 and the said order has been upheld by a coordinate Bench vide order dated 07.07.2026 passed in CWP-17190-2026.
3. He submits that in view of the same, respondent No.4 has no objection if the present petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside for, the petitioner shall institute separate proceedings to take possession of the land in dispute in accordance with law. VIKAS CHANDER 2026.08.14 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-58909-2022
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would have no objection to the same.
5. Keeping in view the fact that an eviction order stands passed qua the land in dispute by the Court of Financial Commissioner (Appeals) on 27.03.2026 and the same has been upheld by a coordinate Bench vide order dated 07.07.2026 passed in CWP-17190-2026, coupled with the fact that learned counsel for respondent No.4 has submitted that he would have no objection if the impugned order is set aside, the present petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 11.10.2022 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Court of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Fatehgarh Churian is set aside.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)
JUDGE August 13, 2026 vcgarg
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No VIKAS CHANDER 2026.08.14 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document