Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRR/2467/2006 of BABU RAM Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. on 13 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 132 CRR-2467-2006 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.08.2026 Babu Ram …Petitioner V/s State of Haryana and another …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Ram Kumar Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-2467-2006 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 13.08.2026
Babu Ram
…Petitioner
V/s State of Haryana and another
…Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Present: Mr. Ram Kumar Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Sahni, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana
Mr. Hoshiar Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2
*** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL)
The instant revision petition was filed by the petitioner against the judgment dated 13.09.2006 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Panchkula, vide which the appeal of the petitioner against the judgment of conviction 17.08.2005 and order of sentence of even date passed by the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panchkula, whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short the “NI Act”) and was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year along with a fine of Rs.25000/- and, in default thereof, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of four months, was dismissed. The fine is stated to have been paid.
2. Vide order dated 15.01.2007 passed by a Coordinate Bench, the revision petition was admitted and the sentence of the petitioner was suspended during the pendency of the revision petition.
3. Today learned State counsel, on instructions from HC Mandeep Singh, Posted at Police Station Pinjore, submits that the petitioner has unfortunately expired. VIKAS CHANDER 2026.08.14 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRR-2467-2006 (O&M)
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not controvert the aforesaid fact.
5. That being so, the instant revision petition stands abated and is disposed of as such.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)
JUDGE August 13, 2026 vcgarg
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No
VIKAS CHANDER 2026.08.14 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document