Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/27269/2026 of YATENDER @ YATIN Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER on 13 August 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 276 CRM-M-27269-2026 Date of decision: 13.08.2026 Yatender @ Yatin ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. GREWAL ***** Present: Mr. Ekteshwar Singh, Advocate, for Mr.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Date of decision: 13.08.2026
Yatender @ Yatin
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. GREWAL
*****
Present:
Mr. Ekteshwar Singh, Advocate, for
Mr. Keshav Partap Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vishal Kashyap, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Bhaskar Sarout, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
****
H. S. GREWAL
, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS (482 Cr.P.C) for quashing of FIR No. 145 dated 14.03.2018 under Sections 279,337,338 of IPC (281, 125 of BNS) registered at Police Station City Bahadurgarh District Jhajjar and the judgment/order dated 05.08.2025 and all other subsequent proceedings arising thereof on the basis of compromise dated 08.05.2026 (Annexure P-6).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the FIR is outcome of a misunderstanding which has now been resolved and with the intervention of the respectables of the Society, the matter has indeed been compromised between the parties. He has referred to the compromise dated 08.05.2026 (Annexure P-6).
3. This Court vide order dated 14.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate/trial Court was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.
4. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.)-cum-JMIC, Bahadurgarh, and got their statements recorded. A copy of report dated 03.06.2026 has been submitted to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.
5. Learned State counsel as well as the counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.
6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
7. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.
8. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 145 dated 14.03.2018 under Sections 279,337,338 of IPC (281, 125 of BNS) registered at Police Station City Bahadurgarh District Jhajjar and the judgment/order dated 05.08.2025 and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom qua the petitioners are hereby quashed subject to payment of costs of Rs.20,000/-. If, costs of Rs.20,000/- has not been paid, the same be paid as early as possible. August 13, 2026 (H. S. GREWAL ) anil
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No