Punjab and Haryana High Court
RA-CR/108/2026 of LUDHIANA IMPROVEMENT TRUST AND ANOTHER Vs DEVI PARSHAD THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS on 7 August 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RA-CR No.108 of 2026 (O&M) in CR No.1225 of 2025 Date of Decision:- 07.08.2026 Ludhiana Improvement Trust Ludhiana and another …..Applicants-petitioners. Versus Devi Parshad (since deceased) through his LRs and others
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RA-CR No.108 of 2026 (O&M) in CR No.1225 of 2025 Date of Decision:- 07.08.2026
Ludhiana Improvement Trust Ludhiana and another …..Applicants-petitioners. Versus Devi Parshad (since deceased) through his LRs and others .....Respondents.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate
for the applicants-petitioners.
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) CM-13022-CII-2026
Prayer in the present application preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, is for condonation of delay of 48 days in filing the review application.
2. Heard.
3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. The delay of 48 days in filing the review application is condoned. RA-CR-108-2026 (O&M)
The instant petition, instituted under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Sections 114 and 151 CPC seeks review of judgment dated YAG DUTT 2026.08.10 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
RA-CR No.108 of 2026 (O&M) in CR No.1225 of 2025
16.04.2026 passed by this Court in CR No.1225 of 2025.
2. Heard.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants-petitioners has not been able to point out any error apparent on the face of the record.
4. The review petition is, therefore, found to be devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL) August 07, 2026
JUDGE Yag Dutt
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.08.10 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.