Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/9184/2026 of KIRANDEEP AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 1 August 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9184-2026 Date of Decision: 01.08.2026 KIRANDEEP AND ANR .....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Petitioners in person. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This
107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-9184-2026
Date of Decision: 01.08.2026
KIRANDEEP AND ANR
.....PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Petitioners in person.
****
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of B.N.S.S with a prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to 4 to provide police protection to the Petitioners and protect the life and liberty of the Petitioners from respondents No.5 to 8 and their accomplices and further issue directions to the respondents No.5 to 8 and their accomplices not to interfere in the lives of the Petitioners in any manner against their wishes by using force on them or by adopting unlawful means.
2. Petitioners in person submits that both are being major, got married against the wishes of private respondents. Ever since then, the petitioners are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 27.07.2026 (Annexure P-
2) was also made to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar wherein a mention has been made about the alleged threat perception. It is further submitted that despite the official respondents RENU RAWAT 2026.08.01 13.28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh having been communicated about the alleged threat perception, no steps have been taken to come to the rescue of the petitioners. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar to look into their representation dated 27.07.2026 (Annexure P-2) and take appropriate steps at the earliest.
3. Notice of motion to respondents No. 1 to 4 only.
4. Mr. Mavpreet Singh, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4.
5. I have heard the parties and perused the record.
6. Keeping in view the mandate of Supreme Court in the case of “Lata Singh V. State of U.P. and another”, JT 2006 (6) SC 173, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar to look into the representation dated 27.07.2026 (Annexure P-2) and take appropriate action in accordance with law to ensure that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents.
7. It is clarified that this order shall not be treated as a stamp of this Court about the marriage of the parties and no opinion with regard to the validity of the marriage has been expressed in this order.
(H.S.GREWAL) 01.08.2026
JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.08.01 13.28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh