Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/9214/2026 of SURINDER KAUR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 1 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9214-2026 Date of Decision: 01.08.2026 SURINDER KAUR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Petitioner in person. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP-9214-2026

Date of Decision: 01.08.2026

SURINDER KAUR

.....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

...RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL

Present:

Petitioner in person.

****

H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for directing respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and also directing respondent No. 4 not to interfere in the personal life and liberty of the petitioner and further directing respondents No. 2 and 3 not to allow/ let respondent No. 4 or anybody else to interfere with life and liberty of the petitioner.

2. Petitioner in person contends that the petitioner had preferred a representation dated 28.07.2026 (Annexure P-2) to respondent No.2 Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS (Mohali) Punjab but no action has been taken so far. It is further submitted that they would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS (Mohali) Punjab to look into their representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest. RENU RAWAT 2026.08.01 13.28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

3. Notice of motion to official respondents No. 1 to 3.

4. Mr. Mavpreet Singh, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondents No 1 to 3.

5. I have heard the petitioners and perused the record.

6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited prayer made by the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS (Mohali) Punjab to consider and decide the representation representation dated 28.07.2026 (Annexure P-2) of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and pass an appropriate order.

(H.S.GREWAL) 01.08.2026

JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.08.01 13.28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead