Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/42150/2026 of SUKHDEV SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 31 July 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.42150 of 2026 Date of Decision:-31.07.2026 Sukhdev Singh …..Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Petitioner in person. VIKRAM AGGARWAL,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
121
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.42150 of 2026 Date of Decision:-31.07.2026
Sukhdev Singh …..Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Petitioner in person.
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
Members of the Bar are abstaining from work.
2. This is a petition moved under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘the BNSS’) seeking the issuance of a direction to respondent No.2 (Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala) to consider and decide the pending representations dated 21.07.2026 and 23.07.2026 (Annexures P-5 and P-6) and to conduct a fair, proper and time bound investigation.
3. The petitioner, who appears in person, has made pointed reference to the representations Annexures P-4 and P-5 stated to have been submitted to respondent No.2 on 11.07.2026 and 21.07.2026 respectively. It has been submitted that despite the submission of the aforesaid representations/complaints, no action has been taken and there is a threat to YAG DUTT 2026.07.31 12:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
CRM-M No.42150 of 2026 -2-
the life of the petitioner and other persons, who are a part of the Management of Gurudwara Dukh Bhanjan Sahib, Village Jangpura, Police Station Banur, District SAS Nagar (Mohali).
4. It has also been submitted that though the Gurudwara Sahib is situated in District Mohali, the jurisdiction is with respondent No.2, i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala.
5. Since there is no representation on behalf of the State, the Court is not in a position to verify the said fact.
6. Be that as it may, having gone through the contents of the representations/complainants (Annexures P-4 to P-6), this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present petition with a direction to respondent No.2 (Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala) to look into the representations/complainants (Annexures P-4 to P-6) and to take action, if so warranted, in accordance with law.
7. The instant petition is accordingly disposed of.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL) July 31, 2026
JUDGE Yag Dutt
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.07.31 12:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.