Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/27339/2026 of SANDEEP SINGH @ SANDIP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER on 31 July 2026
(O&M) -2- or coercion and out of their free will and the private respondent has also made statement to the effect that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed. 4. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
POONAM 2026.07.31 14:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-27339-2026 (O&M) -2- or coercion and out of their free will and the private respondent has also made statement to the effect that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed.
4. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with its report.
5. In view of the report of the learned District & Sessions Judge, SAS Nagar, and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed, qua the petitioners.
6. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL)
JUDGE 31.07.2026 poonam Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No POONAM 2026.07.31 14:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document