Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/31280/2026 of SHARDA Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 29 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 203 AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-828-2026 Date of decision: 29.07.2026 ANCHAL ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: SI- Shri Krishan No. 471 **** H.S.GREWAL,J. (ORAL) CRM-30154-2026 This application has
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-828-2026
Date of decision: 29.07.2026
ANCHAL
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA
...RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
SI- Shri Krishan No. 471
****
H.S.GREWAL,J. (ORAL)
CRM-30154-2026
This application has been filed under Section 528 BNSS (482
Cr.P.C) for making correction in head note and prayer clause by adding Section 109 BNS (307 IPC) (which was added lateron) in the FIR in question, in head note, in order dated 13.01.2026 as well as prayer clause of the main petition.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and under Section 109 BNS (307 IPC) are ordered to be added in the FIR, head note as well as prayer clause of the main petition and in the interim order dated 13.01.2026.
Registry is directed to do the needful, accordingly.
Main case:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Prayer in the present petition, filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No.168 dated 04.11.2025, registered under Sections 115(2) and 123 of the BNS, 2023 and 109 BNS (307 IPC) (which was added lateron) at Police Station Bapoli, District Panipat.
2. The Coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 13.01.2026 RENU RAWAT 2026.07.29 14.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh had directed the petitioner to appear before the SHO/Investigating Officer and join investigation and in the event of her arrest, she was ordered to be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS (erstwhile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.).
3. SI-Shri Krishan present in Court submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for further custodial interrogation.
4. In view of the above, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 13.01.2026 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
5. However, it is clarified that the investigating authority on addition of an offence or offences may not proceed to arrest the accused/petitioner, but for arresting the accused/petitioner on such addition of offence or offences it needs to obtain an order to arrest the accused/petitioners from the Court which had granted the bail in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sumit Vs State of U.P. and Another, Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026, decided on 09.02.2026.
6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 29.07.2026 (H.S.GREWAL) renu
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.29 14.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh