Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/9055/2026 of MEHAK AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 29 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRWP-9055-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.07.2026 MEHAK AND ANOTHER …PETITIONERS V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Petitioners in person. **** SHALINI SINGH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRWP-9055-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.07.2026 MEHAK AND ANOTHER

…PETITIONERS V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

…RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Petitioners in person.

**** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL

J. (Oral) Apprehending threat to their life and liberty, petitioners have filed the present petition with a prayer to direct the official respondents to protect their life and liberty from respondents No.4 to 6. The facts, as can be inferred from the petition, are as follows: The petitioners, who are major, solemnized marriage in accordance with Hindu rites and customs on 27.07.2026. Date of birth of petitioner No.1 is stated to be 18.07.2008 and that of petitioner No.2 is 15.09.2004 as per their Aadhaar Cards. It is stated that relationship of the petitioners was not approved by parents of petitioner No.1. Respondents No.4 to 6 were extending threats to eliminate the petitioners and in this regard petitioners moved representation to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka and SHO P.S. City No.1, Abohar, Fazilka seeking protection of their life and liberty but no action was taken. SUMIT SINGLA 2026.07.29 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-9055-2026 (O&M)

The petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to official respondents to decide representation dated 27.07.2026 (Annexure P-5 within a period of one month. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners, necessary steps warranted under law be taken at the earliest, so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. It is, however, clarified that this order does not express any opinion with regard to the validity of petitioners’ marriage, factum of their age nor shall have any bearing on any civil or criminal action initiated or to be initiated against them. Disposed of accordingly. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) 29.07.2026

JUDGE Sumit Singla Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SUMIT SINGLA 2026.07.29 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead