Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/29397/2026 of SURJEET SINGH AND ANR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR on 29 July 2026
High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 130 CRM-M-29397-2026(O&M) Date of Decision: 29.07.2026 SURJEET SINGH AND ANR ....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Jang Singh, petitioner No.2 in person. **** H.S.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Date of Decision: 29.07.2026
SURJEET SINGH AND ANR
....PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Mr. Jang Singh, petitioner No.2 in person.
****
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
CRM-29992-2026
This application has been filed under Section 528 BNSS (482
Cr.p.C) praying for placing on record Annexure P-7 and P-8.
Allowed as prayed for and Annexure P-7 and P-8 are ordered to be taken on record.
CRM-29993-2026
This application has been filed under Section 528 BNSS (482
Cr.P.C) praying of preponement of the main case.
Allowed as prayed for and main case is taken on Board today itself.
Main case:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Prayer in the present petition filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for seeking quashing of complaint case No.COMI/168/2014 dated 04.07.2014 registered under Sections 120B, 323, 346, 348, 365, 452, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom as well as the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 25.02.2019 on the basis of compromise dated 02.05.2026(Annexure P-3).
2. The Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements RENU RAWAT 2026.07.29 13.39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.
3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned JMIC, Faridkot and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned JMIC, Faridkot has submitted copy of report to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.
4. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.
5. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and complaint case No.COMI/168/2014 dated 04.07.2014 registered under Sections 120B, 323, 346, 348, 365, 452, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom as well as the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 25.02.2019 on the basis of compromise dated 02.05.2026(Annexure P-3) are quashed qua the petitioners.
6. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(H.S.GREWAL) 29.07.2026
JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.29 13.39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh