Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8977/2026 of GURPREET SINGH AND ANR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. on 28 July 2026
M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (114) CRWP-8977-2026 (O & M) Date of decision:28.07.2026 Gurpreet Singh and anr. …... Petitioner(s) V/s State of Punjab and ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Ms. Ashu Rana,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(114) CRWP-8977-2026 (O & M)
Date of decision:28.07.2026 Gurpreet Singh and anr. …... Petitioner(s) V/s State of Punjab and ors. ...Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Ms. Ashu Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI,
J. (Oral)
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this is the first marriage between the petitioners. The petitioners have prayed for the issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents for protecting their civil/personal rights and liberties from being violated by the private respondents. The petitioners are alleged to have solemnized marriage on 23.07.2026 (Annexure P-5) on attaining the age of majority. They feel reasonable apprehension and a threat perception at the hands of the private respondents and pray that their personal/civil rights be not violated by them. Precisely, in the context of the aforesaid relief, the petitioners have approached the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala-respondent No.2 by way of a representation dated 23.07.2026 (Annexure P-7). SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.07.28 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
::2:: Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. At this stage, without expressing any opinion as to the validity of the marriage and majority of the petitioners, it would be just and appropriate to direct respondent No.2 to look into the grievance of the petitioners and pass an appropriate order on merits in accordance with law. Respondent No.2 would pass necessary order without being influenced by any pleadings made in the petition. It would be appreciated if the needful is done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this order shall not debar the official respondents from proceeding against any of the parties, if they are involved in any other case. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. July 28, 2026
( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) sukhpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.07.28 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh