Punjab and Haryana High Court

CWP/22773/2026 of AMIT KUMAR GOYAL Vs UNION OF INDIA on 28 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ( Sr. No. 110 ) CWP No. 22773 of 2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.07.2026 Amit Kumar Goyal .....Petitioner Versus Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present :

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

( Sr. No. 110 )

CWP No. 22773 of 2026 (O&M)

Date of decision: 28.07.2026

Amit Kumar Goyal .....Petitioner

Versus

Union of India and others .....Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL

Present : Mr. Rohit Bhardwar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Varun Issar, Senior Standing Counsel for

the respondent(s)-Income Tax Department.

* * *

DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the officer competent to take a decision on the application dated 08.06.2026 (Annexure P-4) filed by the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the respondent(s)-Income Tax Department, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above alternate prayer made on behalf of the petitioner is accepted.

Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the officer competent to take a decision on the aforesaid application filed by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of SUNIL YADAV 2026.07.29 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order. Chandigarh

CWP No.22773 of 2026 (O&M) [2]

hearing to all affected parties, preferably within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law.

Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the same is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law.

( DEEPAK SIBAL )

JUDGE

28.07.2026

( RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL ) sunil yadav

JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No

Whether reportable : Yes / No SUNIL YADAV 2026.07.29 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order. Chandigarh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead