Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/21852/2026 of BUNTY Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 28 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Bunty State of Punjab Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of Uploading: Date of

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-2185

IN THE HIG IN THE HIG IN THE HIG IN THE HIG

Bunty

State of Punj

Date of decis Date of decis Date of decis Date of decis Date of Uplo Date of Uplo Date of Uplo Date of Uplo

CORAM:

CORAM:

CORAM:

CORAM:

Present Present Present Present:

SUMEET G SUMEET G SUMEET G SUMEET G

2023 for gr 22.07.2025, 249, 238, 32 1959 added l

2. seeks to with

2.

3. July 28 July 28 July 28 July 28, 202 , 202 , 202 , 202 mahavir Whether spea Whether repo

52-2026

GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H

CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-21852 21852 21852 21852-2 versus jab

sion: sion: sion: sion: July 28 July 28 July 28 July 28, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 oading: oading: oading: oading: July 28 July 28 July 28 July 28, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUME HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUME HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUME HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUME Mr. Samay Singh Sandhawalia, A ***** ***** ***** ***** GOEL GOEL GOEL GOEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed u rant of regular bail to the petitio registered for offences punishable 24(4), 111 of the BNS, 2023 (Sec later on), at Police Station Kotkapu Learned counsel for the petition hdraw the petition in hand, at this s Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, sh

aking/reasoned: Yes/No ortable:

Yes/No

HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH

....Petitioner

....Respondent EET GOEL EET GOEL EET GOEL EET GOEL Advocate for the petitioner. under Section 483 of the BNSS, oner, in case FIR No.180 dated e under Sections 109, 103, 61(2), ctions 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, ura, District Faridkot. ner, after arguing for sometime, tage. all also stand disposed of.

(SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL)

JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.28 16:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead