Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8974/2026 of ANISH ALIAS BADU Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 28 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8974-2026 Date of decision :28.07.2026 ANISH ALIAS BADU ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vipul Sherwal, Asstt.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-8974-2026
Date of decision :28.07.2026 ANISH ALIAS BADU ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vipul Sherwal, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) The prayer in the present petition is under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the impugned order dated 22.06.2026 (Annexure P-3) passed by the respondent No.1, whereby the prayer for grant of premature release has been deferred for 02 years despite fulfilling all the conditions of Premature Release Police dated 12.04.2002 (Annexure P-2). The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in view of the judgment in the case of “Pholu @ Polu Ram Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.” in CRWP-8232-2022 decided on 05.02.2024 and “Raju @ Rajesh Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.” in CRWP-2160-2024 decided on 11.03.2024 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the impugned order whereby the case of premature release of the petitioner was deferred for 02 years could not have been passed. JITESH LAL 2026.07.29 11:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8974-2026
On the other hand, the learned State counsel fairly accepts the aforementioned legal position in view of the abovementioned judgments passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. In view of the above, the impugned order dated 22.06.2026 (Annexure P-3) stands quashed. The State of Haryana is directed to re-consider the case of the petitioner for the grant of premature release and pass an order in accordance with law within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed by this Court. Disposed of .
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 28.07.2026 JITESH Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No JITESH LAL 2026.07.29 11:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document