Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/26903/2026 of VIJAY BABAN WADEKAR Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 28 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 323 CRM-M-26903-2026 Date of Decision:- 28.07.2026 VIJAY BABAN WADEKAR ……PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .…RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Yash Dev Kaushik, Advocate for the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Date of Decision:- 28.07.2026 VIJAY BABAN WADEKAR ……PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .…RESPONDENT(S)

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI

Present: Mr. Yash Dev Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Geeta Rani, AAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) On 13.05.2026, the following order was passed:- “The prayer in the present petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 is for quashing of the order dated 15.10.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by the CJM, Faridabad in case FIR No.96 dated 01.02.2023 registered under Sections 406, 420, 506, 120-B IPC (corresponding Sections 316, 318(4), 351(2), 61 of BNS, 2023) whereby the petitioner’s bail was cancelled and the bail bonds and surety bonds were forfeited for non-appearance before the Trial Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that on account of a medical condition of the petitioner, he remained absent on 15.10.2025 because of which the impugned order came to be passed. He states that he is ready and willing to join proceedings once again. Notice of motion for 28.07.2026. In the meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the Trial Court within a period of one week from today subject to a deposit of Rs.25,000/- as costs with the Punjab and Haryana High Court Dispensary Welfare Fund, A/c No.45115269583, SBI, Sector 16, Chandigarh and on his doing he shall be admitted to interim bail to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.” KUSUM 2026.07.28 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh

2. In pursuance to the afore-mentioned order, the petitioner has been released and has since been admitted to the interim bail vide order dated 19.05.2026. A copy of this order is taken on record and marked as ‘Mark A’. The petitioner has already deposited the amount of Rs.25,000/-.

3. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court.

4. It is expected that the petitioner shall not absent himself from trial without sufficient cause.

5. Disposed of.

(JASJIT SINGH BEDI)

JUDGE 28.07.2026 KUSUM Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2026.07.28 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead