Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/22375/2026 of VISHAL @ VISHAL CHANDALIA Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 28 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22375-2026 Date of decision :28.07.2026 VISHAL @ VISHAL CHANDALIA ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Gurmanpreet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Naveen Bawa, Advocate for the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-22375-2026

Date of decision :28.07.2026 VISHAL @ VISHAL CHANDALIA ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Gurmanpreet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Naveen Bawa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Toor, Asstt. A.G., Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) On 23.04.2026, the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the injury attracting Section 118(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 is stated to be on the flank, being a lacerated wound and is not attributable to the petitioner herein. He further submits that eventually, the petitioner was also attacked upon by the accused (complainant party in the present case) with respect to the same an FIR bearing No.183 dated 12.08.2025 under Sections 109, 118(2), 61(2), 191 (3), 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 has been registered at Police Station Sadar, Ludhiana. It is contended that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when called for and to extend all cooperation to the Investigating Agency. Notice of motion. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr. DAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and prays for some time to complete instructions and file reply, if so advised. JITESH LAL 2026.07.29 11:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-22375-2026

Reply, if any, be filed on or before the adjourned date with copy in advance to the learned counsel opposite. Adjourned to 28.07.2026. In the meanwhile, the petitioner(s) is directed to join investigation as and when so required by the Investigating Agency. In the event of the petitioner(s) joining investigation, he shall be admitted to interim bail by the arresting officer/investigating officer on his furnishing of bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer. The petitioner(s) shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) of 2023.

2. Despite passing of the aforementioned order, the petitioner has not joined investigation.

3. In view of the above, the present petition stands dismissed.

(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 28.07.2026 JITESH Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No JITESH LAL 2026.07.29 11:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead