Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/8962/2026 of DHUPINDER KAUR SANDHU AND ANR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. on 28 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8962-2026 Date of decision: 28.07.2025 DHUPINDER KAUR SANDHU AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Krishan Kanha, Advocate (Through V.C) for the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP-8962-2026

Date of decision: 28.07.2025

DHUPINDER KAUR SANDHU AND ANOTHER

...Petitioners

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present:

Mr. Krishan Kanha, Advocate (Through V.C)

for the petitioners.

Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab.

*****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL

, J. (Oral)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of appropriate directions to respondents No.2 and 3, to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners, who apprehend threat to their life at the hands of private respondents No.4 to 7, and not to harass or interfere in the peaceful life of the petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are in live-in-relationship and are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 20.07.2026 (Annexure P-4) was also made to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Bathinda for protection of their lives and liberty but in vain. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.28 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Police, Bathinda to look into their representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest.

3. Notice of motion.

4. Mr. J.S. Rattu, learned DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of official respondents.

5. In view of above, petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Bathinda, to provide necessary protection to the petitioners after considering threat perceptions to their life and liberty and to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents.

6. Pending application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 28.07.2026 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.28 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead