Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/16245/2024 of BAL RAM Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 28 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ( Sr. No. 105 ) CWP No. 16245 of 2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.07.2026 Balram .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present : Mr. Jai
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
( Sr. No. 105 )
CWP No. 16245 of 2024 (O&M)
Date of decision: 28.07.2026
Balram .....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others .....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Present : Mr. Jai Singh Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vivek Saini, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
* * *
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
At the outset, learned State counsel submits that before the next elections to Municipal Corporation, Gurugram to be held in 2030, a fresh notification, laying down the extent of reservation etc., shall be issued.
In the light of the above statement, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the afore notification as and when it will be issued.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
( DEEPAK SIBAL )
JUDGE
28.07.2026
( RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL ) sunil yadav
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No
Whether reportable : Yes / No SUNIL YADAV 2026.07.29 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order. Chandigarh