Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/17585/2026 of MS MAHARAJ SH UDHO DASS DHARMARTH GOSHALA MANDIR ASHRAM Vs GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND OTHERS on 28 July 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.114 CWP-17585-2026 Date of decision: 28.07.2026 M/s Maharaj Sh. Udho Dass Dharmarth Gosala Mandir Ashram ....Petitioner Versus Government of India and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.114
CWP-17585-2026
Date of decision: 28.07.2026
M/s Maharaj Sh. Udho Dass Dharmarth Gosala Mandir Ashram
....Petitioner
Versus
Government of India and others
....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Present:
Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate (through VC) and Mrs. Anjali Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Varun Issar, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Nikita Garg, Jr. Standing Counsel for the respondents.
* * *
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the parties agree that the relief claimed through this petition has been granted by the respondents, rendering the present petition infructuous.
2. Disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE July 28, 2026 Jyoti 1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JYOTI SHARMA 2026.07.29 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh