Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRR/1797/2026 of TARANJEET SINGH ALIAS LADDI Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 28 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 123 CRM-29961-2026 AND CRR-1797-2026 Date of Decision: 28.07.2026 TARANJEET SINGH ALIAS LADDI ....Petitioner V/s STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .…Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. A.P. Kaushal, Advocate, for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
123
CRM-29961-2026 AND
CRR-1797-2026
Date of Decision: 28.07.2026
TARANJEET SINGH ALIAS LADDI
....Petitioner
V/s
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
.…Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Present: Mr. A.P. Kaushal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
*** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that certain documents could advertently not be annexed. He, therefore, prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action after annexing all the relevant documents.
In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn, with liberty aforesaid. However, the said liberty shall not be construed to have condoned any delay in filing the petition.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)
JUDGE July 28, 2026 Mani Kumar
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No MANI KUMAR 2026.07.29 13:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document