Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8957/2026 of NEHA DEVI AND ANR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. on 28 July 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (112) CRWP-8957-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 28.07.2026 Neha Devi and anr. …... Petitioners V/s State of Punjab and ors. .....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate, for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(112) CRWP-8957-2026 (O & M)
Date of decision: 28.07.2026 Neha Devi and anr.
…... Petitioners V/s State of Punjab and ors.
.....Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** JASJIT SINGH BEDI,
J. (Oral)
The present Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of appropriate directions to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from private respondents.
2. Petitioner no.1 is stated to be born on 23.02.2002. Petitioner no.2 is stated to be born on 25.03.1987 and for the said purpose, reference has been made to Aadhaar card (Annexures P-1 and P-2). It is stated that the petitioners are in a “Live in Relationship” since petitioner no.1/Neha Devi is unmarried and petitioner No.2/Gorav Singh is married to respondent No.4- Tanu Salaria and no child has born out of this wedlock. Petitioner No.2 is living separately from his wife for more than 08 years. However, petitioners have a girl child, namely, Aira Pathania (born on 08.02.2026) out of their present relationship.
chandigarh
CRWP-8957-2026 ::2::
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in a judgment dated 18.05.2021 passed in CRWP-4521- 2021 titled as “Pardeep Singh and another vs. State of Haryana and others” has granted protection in a case where the petitioners were living in a “Live in Relationship”.
4. The learned counsel relies upon an order dated 03.09.2021 passed in LPA-769-2021 titled as “Ishrat Bano and another vs. State of Punjab and others” whereby this Court granted protection to the petitioners therein while observing that a criminal case had been registered against the parties and one of the parties therein was not legally divorced.
5. The learned counsel has further relied upon an order passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 03.09.2021, in CRWP-7874-2021 titled as “Paramjit Kaur and another vs. State of Punjab and others” as per which although the divorce petition filed by petitioner no.2 therein was dismissed, yet this Court had granted protection to the petitioners.
6. The learned Counsel for the petitioners has relied upon an order passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.11.2021 passed in CRWP-10411-2021 Amandeep Kaur & Anr. Vs. State of Punjab & Ors. as per which in a case where one of the parties was married and was living in with another person other than her husband, this Court had granted protection to the petitioners.
7. Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioners have given a representation dated 20.07.2026 (Annexure P-4) to respondent no.2- chandigarh
CRWP-8957-2026 ::3:: Senior Superintendent of Police, District Pathankot, Punjab and they would be satisfied in case respondent no.2 is directed to look into the said representation and after considering threat perception to the petitioners, to take appropriate action.
8. Notice of motion to respondents Nos.1 to 3 only.
9. On advance notice, Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondents Nos.1 to 3 and has stated that he has no objection in case respondent no.2 is directed to look into the representation of the petitioners on the aspect of threat perception and to take appropriate action, in accordance with law.
10. This Court has heard learned counsel for the parties.
11. It goes without saying that the protection of life and liberty is a basic feature of the Constitution of India as emanating out of Article 21. Every person, moreso, a major, has right to live his/her life with a person of his/ her choice subject to the laws as applicable. Whenever this Court, prima-facie, is satisfied that on account of some relatives/ persons being unhappy with the relationship between the petitioners could cause harm to the life and liberty of the petitioners, then in such circumstances, the Courts are required to pass necessary directions for their protection.
12. Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances and without commenting upon the legality of the relationship between the petitioners or expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present petition with a direction to chandigarh
CRWP-8957-2026 ::4:: respondent no.2 to consider the representation dated 20.07.2026 (Annexure P-4) and to assess the threat perception to the petitioners and after considering the same, respondent No.2 shall take appropriate action in accordance with law.
13. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of with abovesaid directions.
14. It is, however, clarified that this order shall not debar the State and/or any person aggrieved from initiating appropriate proceeding against any or both of the petitioners, if any cause of action arises by the petitioners ‘living in’ together or if they are involved in any case. ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) July 28, 2026
JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No chandigarh