Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8994/2026 of MADHU AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 28 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 155 CRWP-8994-2026 MADHU AND ANR ....PETITIONERS V/s STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ....RESPONDENTS Date of decision: 28.07.2026 Date of Uploading: 28.07.2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Mukul Bura, Advocate for the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
MADHU AND ANR
....PETITIONERS
V/s
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
....RESPONDENTS
Date of decision: 28.07.2026
Date of Uploading: 28.07.2026
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present:
Mr. Mukul Bura, Advocate
for the petitioners.
*****
SUMEET GOEL
, J.
ORAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners are seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their life and liberty at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 9.
2. Notice of motion to respondents Nos. 1 to 3 (i.e. official respondents).
3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.
4. As per the petitioners, they have married on 26.07.2026 against the wishes of respondent Nos. 4 to 9, who happen to be the family members/relative of the petitioners. JATIN 2026.07.28 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
5. Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that date of birth of petitioner No.1-Madhu is 22.01.2002 and petitioner No.2-Karan is 04.03.2002.
6. Without commenting on the legality and validity of the marriage as also the merits of contentions raised in the petition, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 (Superintendent of Police, Panipat) to look into the representation dated 26.07.2026 (Annexure P-6) stated to have been submitted by the petitioners & pass appropriate orders thereupon within two weeks from today.
7. Liberty is reserved in favour of private respondents to seek recall of this order on showing sufficient cause.
8. However, if the petitioners are found to have been involved in any other case, then this order shall not preclude the competent authority from taking lawful action against the petitioners.
9. The petition stands disposed off. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off.
(SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE 28.07.2026 jatin Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No JATIN 2026.07.28 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document