Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/59037/2025 of SHIVANI MALIK AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER on 28 July 2026
-2- Main Case 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, seeking quashing of the below detailed First Information Report (FIR), and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of the compromise dated 28.05.2025 (Annexure P-2), effected between the
POONAM
CRM-M-59037
-2025 (O&M)
Main Case
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, seeking quashing of the below detailed First Information Report (FIR), and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of the compromise dated 28.05.2025 (Annexure P-2), effected between the parties. DETAILS OF CRIMINAL CASE:- FIR No. Date Section(s) Police Station
02.04.2025 318(4) and 61 of BNS,
PS Sector 37, Gurugram
2. Vide order dated 19.11.2025, the affected parties were directed to appear before the learned Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise.
3. Report has since been received from learned District and Sessions Judge, Gurugram, in pursuance to the directions of this Court wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report(s) compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the private respondent has also made statement to the effect that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed.
4. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with its report. POONAM
CRM-M-59037-2025 (O&M)
5. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and the private respondent is the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question.
6. In view of the report of the learned District & Sessions Judge, Gurugram, and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed, qua the petitioners.
7. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL)
JUDGE 28.07.2026 poonam Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
POONAM