Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/27424/2026 of RAMAN KUMAR @ RAMNA Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 28 July 2026
-2- 4. Learned State counsel states on instructions from ASI Pawan Kumar that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 14.05.2026 is
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
POONAM 2026.07.29 14:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-27424-2026 (O&M) -2-
4. Learned State counsel states on instructions from ASI Pawan Kumar that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for custodial interrogation.
5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 14.05.2026 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 28th July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.29 14:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document