Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/24905/2026 of PARDEEP KUMAR Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 28 July 2026
(1103 (1103 (1stststst case)case)case)case) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Pardeep Kumar State of Haryana Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-24905
103 (1 103 (1 103 (1 103 (1stststst case) case) case) case) IN THE HIG IN THE HIG IN THE HIG IN THE HIG
Pardeep Kuma State of Harya
Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Decis Date of Uploa Date of Uploa Date of Uploa Date of Uploa
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
Present Present Present Present:
SUMEET GO SUMEET GO SUMEET GO SUMEET GO
Nagarik Surak anticipatory b for offences p 1860, at Polic
2. p
5-2026
GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-24905
24905-2 ar
versus ana
ion: ion: ion: ion: July 28
July 28, 2026
ading: ading: ading: ading: July 28
July 28, 2026
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEE Mr. Kshitiz Sharma, Senior Advoc Ms. Tamanna Banwala, Advocate (presence marked through video presence marked through video presence marked through video presence marked through video-co co co co Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG Haryana ***** ***** ***** ***** OEL OEL OEL OEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed un ksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BN ail to the petitioner, in case FIR N punishable under Sections 120-B, 4 e Station Civil Line, Sonipat. On 14.05.2026, the following orde “Apprehending his arrest in FIR N Sections 120-B, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 of Sonipat; the petitioner has preferred this peti Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest ba Learned senior counsel for the petiti namely Suresh Kumar, Vikas @ Viki, Harin extended the concession of anticipatory bail the petitioner is willing to join investigation a Adjourned to 27.05.2026. Be taken up in the urgent cause list. The State shall be at liberty to file ad The petitioner is directed to ap 16.05.2026 at 11:00 A.M. in concerned Polic of arrest, the petitioner shall be released personal/surety bond(s) to the satisfaction of As and when further called by Investiga investigation. He shall abide by the condit Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.” ”
HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH
....Petitioner
....Respondent ET GOEL ET GOEL ET GOEL ET GOEL cate with for the petitioner onferencing onferencing onferencing onferencing). a. nder Section 482 of the Bhartiya NSS’) for grant of concession of o.412 dated 12.08.2022, registered 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC, er was passed: No. 412, dated 12.08.2022 registered under f IPC, at Police Station Civil Lines, District tition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik ail. tioner, inter alia, contends that the co-accused nder Saini, Ram Chander and Omi have been il by this Court/concerned Sessions Court & and cooperate therein as per law.
additional status report, if so advised. ppear before the Investigating Officer on ice Station and join investigation. In the event d on interim bail subject to his furnishing of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. ating Officer, the petitioner shall join the ition(s) enumerated under Section 482(2) of
r t a f d , r t k d n & n t g r. e f MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.28 16:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-24905
24905-2026
3. Learned State counsel (on instructions) has stated that pursuant to the order dated 14.05.2026, the petitioner has joined investigation, but his custodial interrogation is required in view of seriousness of the allegations.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the State and upon perusal of the record; especially in view of the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is being sought only in view of seriousness of the allegations; the interim order dated 14.05.2026 passed by this Court is made absolute, subject to the conditions as enumerated under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.
5. Petition stands allowed allowed allowed allowed, accordingly.
6. This order should not be treated as “blanket” order. It will not be read as granting petitioner indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to the FIR mentioned ibid and will not operate in respect of any other incident that involves commission of an offence.
7. Liberty is reserved in favour of State/complainant to move for cancellation/recall of this order in case the petitioner violates any condition stipulated under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 or upon showing any other sufficient cause.
8. Needless to say that anything observed herein above shall not be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case.
9. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
July 28, 2026
mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.28 16:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment