Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/8853/2026 of ARISTHI JASWAL AND ANR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS on 28 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH 112 CRWP-8853-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.07.2026 ARISTHI JASWAL AND ANOTHER …Petitioners V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Hardeep Singh,

CRWP-8853-2026 (O&M) 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

CHANDIGARH

112

CRWP-8853-2026 (O&M)

Date of decision: 28.07.2026

ARISTHI JASWAL AND ANOTHER

…Petitioners

V/S

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

…Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL

Present:

Mr. Hardeep Singh, Advocate and

Mr. Karandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Akash Yadav, AAG Punjab.

****

SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J.(ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Apprehending threat to their life and liberty, the petitioners have filed the present petition with a prayer to direct the official respondents to protect their life and liberty from respondents No.4 to 6.

2. The facts, as can be inferred from the petition, are as follows: The petitioners, who are major, solemnized marriage in accordance with Hindu rites and ceremonies on 21.07.2026. Date of birth of petitioner No.1 is stated to be 10.09.2005 and that of petitioner No.2 is 03.04.1998 as per their Aadhar Cards. It is stated that relationship of the petitioners was not approved by respondents No. 4 to 6 (parents and relative of petitioner No. 1). Respondents No. 4 to 6 were extending threats to eliminate the petitioners and in this regard petitioners moved representation to AJAY GOSWAMI 2026.07.28 19:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-8853-2026 (O&M) 2

respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka seeking protection of their life and liberty but no action was taken.

3. Notice of motion to official respondents only.

4. Mr. Akash Yadav, AAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that petitioners’ representation was received and same shall be considered in accordance with law.

5. The petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to official respondents to decide representation dated 21.07.2026 (Annexure P-5) within a period of one month. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners, necessary steps warranted under law be taken at the earliest, so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.

6. It is, however, clarified that this order does not express any opinion with regard to the validity of petitioners’ marriage, factum of their age nor shall have any bearing on any civil or criminal action initiated or to be initiated against them.

7. Disposed of accordingly. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) 28.07.2026 JUDGE Ajay Goswami Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No AJAY GOSWAMI 2026.07.28 19:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead