CRWP/4378/2026 of AJAY KUMAR ARYA Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS on 27 July 2026

1. been filed fo respondents private respo

2. civil suit in D Civil Judge ( by restraining property. De brought JCB order passed that petitione pending adju 8-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA

r Arya

VERSUS njab and others

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Mr. Akashdeep Miglani, Advoca Mr. Hardeep Singh Wadhwa, DA Mr. Akashdeep Singh, Advocate Mr. T.P.S. Bawa, Advocate for r

*** gh Nagpal, J.(Oral) The petition under Article 226 r issuance of a writ in the nature to protect the life and liberty o ondents and to decide his compla Learned counsel for the petition District Court, SAS Nagar for pe (Junior Division) vide order date g the respondents from disposses espite the interim order of sta Bs, damaged vehicles and thus, b by learned Civil Judge, Junior D er filed a contempt petition in th udication. Though, the factum

F PUNJAB AND HARYANA ARH CRWP-4378-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.07.2026

Petitioner

Respondents LINI SINGH NAGPAL ate for the petitioner. AG, Punjab. e and respondents No.4 and 5. of the Constitution of India has e of mandamus directing official of the petitioner at the hands of aint dated 08.04.2026. ner submits that petitioner filed a ermanent injunction and learned ed 27.02.2026 granted status quo ssing the petitioner from the suit atus quo, respondents forcibly blatantly violated the status quo Division, SAS, Nagar. It is urged he Civil Court and the same was of violation of the order was )

r s

s l f a d o t y o d s s KAPIL

brought to th respondents f

3. Police, Distri taken on reco against respo parties were was joined i disclose any dispossession controversy b possession, u found to es registration o Kharar-1 dat

4. behalf of res Court today,

5.

6. associating t evidence sub petitioner has be made out already seize 8-2026 he notice of the Civil Court, no from violating the order. Status report by way of affidav ict SAS Nagar, has been filed by ord. Learned State counsel sub ondents No.4 and 5 was inquire recorded and documents were t in the inquiry. CCTV footage y act of demolition of shed, n or commission of any cogniz between the parties was found t use of land and alleged breach o stablish commission of any c of a criminal case. Accordingly ed 07.07.2026, complaint of the Mr. Akashdeep Singh, Advoc spondents No.4 and 5 and filed which is taken on record. Heard. The matter has been duly in the petitioner and considering t bmitted by the parties. No thr s been perceived, nor any cogni

t. The dispute is civil in natu ed of the matter. As such, there i action was taken to restrain the vit of Senior Superintendent of y learned State counsel, which is bmits that petitioner’s complaint d into. Statements of respective taken on record. Petitioner, too, was examined which did not damage of vehicles, forcible zable offence as alleged. The to be civil in nature, relating to of civil rights. No material was cognizable offence warranting y, vide report No.1161/5C/DSP petitioner was consigned. cate has put in appearance on memorandum of appearance in nquired into by the police by the documentary and electronic reat to life and liberty of the izable offence has been found to ure, and the competent court is is no ground for issuing any writ e f s t e , t e e o s g P n n y c e o s t KAPIL

in the natur remedies ava

7.

8. 27.07.2026 Kapil 8-2026 re of mandamus. Petitioner is ailable to him in accordance with The petition stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applicati Whether Speaking/Reason Whether Reportable :

s relegated to avail alternative h law. ion, if any, stands disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE oned :

Yes/No

Yes/No e

) KAPIL