Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8916/2026 of HARSHDEEP SINGH ALIAS SAMMY OBEROI Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 27 July 2026
Singh alias Sammy Oberoi State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. 1. been filed for issuance of directions to offic protection to the petitioner and to take action on the representation dated 06.07.2026 moved by the
CRWP-8916
Harshdeep S
State of Pun
CORAM: H
Present:
Shalini Sing
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. been filed fo protection to 06.07.2026 m
2. businessman extortion cal extending thr On the basis 20.06.2026, u security was continued un respondents taken.
3. 6-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA
Singh alias Sammy Oberoi VERSUS njab and others
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Mr. Nikhil Deora, Advocate for Mr. Akash Yadav, AAG, Punjab
*** gh Nagpal, J.(Oral) The petition under Article 226 r issuance of directions to offici o the petitioner and to take acti moved by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petition engaged in garment trade, wh lls from international numbers reats to eliminate him and his fa s of an inquiry conducted by under Section 308(4) of BNS w s provided to the petitioner o nabated. A representation was t on 06.07.2026, seeking enhanc Notice of motion.
F PUNJAB AND HARYANA ARH CRWP-8916-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.07.2026
Petitioner
Respondents LINI SINGH NAGPAL the petitioner. b.
of the Constitution of India has ial respondents to provide police ion on the representation dated ner submits that petitioner was a ho had been receiving repeated s, demanding Rs.2 crores and amily in case of non compliance. the police, FIR No.136 dated was registered. Temporary policy on 31.05.2025 but the threats thereafter moved to the official ced security but no action was )
r s
s e d a d d . d y s l s KAPIL 2026.07.27 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8916
4. official respo that on the b was register threat percep petitioner. A to be reviewe to state that in near future
5.
6. petitioner wo appropriate a required to b
7.
8. of. 27.07.2026 Kapil 6-2026 Mr. Akash Yadav, AAG, Punja ondents. He, on instructions fro asis of complaint dated 30.05.20 ed against unknown persons o ption, two personal security o As per Standard Operating Proce ed every two months. He further the security provided to the pet e. Heard. The Court is sanguine that threa ould be reviewed as per the Sta action as per law would be ta e issued in the wake of response The petition stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applicati Whether Speaking/Reason Whether Reportable :
ab, accepts notice on behalf of om ASI Rajesh Kumar, submits 026 made by the petitioner, FIR on 20.06.2026. After assessing officers were provided to the edure, the threat perception was r submits that he has instructions itioner would not be withdrawn at assessment with respect to the andard Operating Procedure and aken. No further directions are e of learned State counsel. ion, if any, also stands disposed (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE oned :
Yes/No
Yes/No f s R g e s s n e d e d
) KAPIL 2026.07.27 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document