Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/6606/2025 of RAJ ALIAS RAJ KAUR AND ANR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER on 27 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.279 CRM-M-6606-2025 Decided on : 27.07.2026 Raj @ Raj Kaur and another ...... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL *** Present : Mr. Nitin Narula, Advocate for
CRM-M-6606-2025 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Sr.No.279
CRM-M-6606-2025
Decided on : 27.07.2026
Raj @ Raj Kaur and another
...... Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
...... Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
***
Present :
Mr. Nitin Narula, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Nitesh Sharma, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate
for respondent No.2.
***
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, seeking quashing of FIR No.0034 dated 03.04.2024, registered under Sec- tions 420, 120-B IPC and Section 13 of the Punjab Travel Professionals (Regulation) Act, 2014, at Police Station Bhindi Saidan, District Amritsar Rural and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of the compromise dated 30.01.2025 (Annexure P-2), effected between the parties.
Chandigarh
CRM-M-6606-2025 2
2. Vide order dated 20.08.2025, the affected parties were directed to appear before the learned Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise.
3. Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ajnala in pursuance to the directions of this Court wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report(s), compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the private respondent has also made statement to the effect that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed.
4. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with its report.
5. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and the private respondent is the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question.
6. In view of the report of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ajnala, and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Pun- jab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is al- lowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it qua petitioners, are hereby quashed.
Chandigarh
CRM-M-6606-2025 3
7. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below.
8. Petition stands disposed of. 27.07.2026 (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) mamta JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Chandigarh