Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8904/2026 of MANPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 27 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 122 MANPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents no.2 & 3
IN THE
AT
MANPREET K
STATE OF PUN
CORAM: HO
Present:
Mr.
H.S. GREWAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Thi Constitution of I respondents no.2 private responde as the petitioners wrong but are fac
2. Le been in a live in been extending t their live in r representation d that the matter w (Rural), District submits that the p No.2-Senior Sup aforesaid represe
E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB T CHANDIGARH
CR
Dat KAUR AND ANOTHER VERSUS
NJAB AND OTHERS ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GR . Sandeep Kumar Bansal, Advoca
**** , J. (ORAL) is Criminal Writ Petition has bee India, for issuance of a writ in th 2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty ents No.4 to 6 not to harass or inte s are known to each other from a cing threats from respondents No arned counsel for the petitioners n relationship with petitioner No. threats of dire consequences to the relationship. While drawing th ated 20.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) was reported to respondent No.2- t Ludhiana seeking police help petitioners would be satisfied if d perintendent of Police (Rural), D entation and take appropriate steps
AND HARYANA
RWP-8904-2026 te of Decision: 27.07.2026 ...PETITIONERS ....RESPONDENTS REWAL ate for the petitioners. en filed under Article 226 of the he nature of mandamus directing y of the petitioners and to restrain erfere in the life of the petitioners a long time and had done nothing .4 to 6. submits that petitioner No.1 has .2. The private respondents have e petitioners as they are averse to he attention of this Court to ), learned counsel has submitted
- Senior Superintendent of Police p but in vain. Learned counsel directions are issued to respondent District Ludhiana to look into the s at the earliest. e g n s g s e o o d e l t e POONAM RATHORE 2026.07.27 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8904-20
3. Not
4. At t notice on behalf
5. In petitioners and w petitioners, the respondent No.2 look into the afo necessary steps, and liberty of t respondents. Ho criminal action, w
6. It is a blanket order o this order shall required in any c
July 27, 2026 poonam
Wh
Wh tice of motion to respondents No. the asking of the Court, Mr. P.S.P of respondents No. 1 to 3. view of the limited prayer ma without commenting upon the sta e present petition is dispo 2-Senior Superintendent of Polic oresaid representation qua the al as may be required, in accordanc the petitioners is not jeopardiz owever, this direction will hav which could be initiated in the ma s made clear that there is no adju of protection from arrest in any F not come in the way if the in cognizable case.
hether speaking/ reasoned : hether Reportable :
1 to 3 only. Pandher, Asst. A.G.Punjab accepts ade by learned counsel for the atus of live in relationship of the osed of with directions to ce (Rural), District Ludhiana to leged threat perception and take ce with law, to ensure that the life zed at the hands of the private ve no effect on any civil or atter in accordance with law. udication on merits and this is not FIR. It is further made clear that nterrogation of the petitioners is (H.S.GREWAL)
JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No s e e o o e e e r t t s POONAM RATHORE 2026.07.27 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document