Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8921/2026 of SEHAJPREET KAUR AND ANR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS on 27 July 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 124 SEHAJPREET KAUR AND ANR STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr.Gurpreet S. Sidhu, H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This Constitution of India for directing the respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the
IN
SEHAJPREET
STATE OF PU
CORAM: HO
Present:
Mr
H.S. GREWAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Thi Constitution of lives and liberty not to interfere respondents No. interfere with th manner.
2. Lea petitioners being Ever since then, the private re (Annexure P-5) Police, District threat perception having been com
THE HIGH COURT OF PUN
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-8
Date of D T KAUR AND ANR
VERSUS
UNJAB AND OTHERS ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.G .Gurpreet S. Sidhu, Advocate fo
**** L, J. (ORAL) is Criminal Writ Petition has bee India for directing the respond y of the petitioners and also direc in the personal lives and liberty . 2 and 3 not to allow responden he liberty and lives of the petit arned counsel for the petitio g major, got married against the , the petitioners are being threat spondents. Resultantly, a rep was also made to respondent N Fazilka wherein a mention ha
n. Learned counsel submits that mmunicated about the alleged thr
NJAB AND HARYANA
8921-2026 Decision: 27.07.2026
.....PETITIONERS
....RESPONDENTS GREWAL or the petitioners. en filed under Article 226 of the ents No. 2 and 3 to protect the cting the respondents No. 4 to 6 y of the petitioners and directing nts No. 4 to 6 or anybody else to tioners or to harass them in any oners submits that both the e wishes of private respondents. tened with dire consequences by presentation dated 20.07.2026 No.2- Senior Superintendent of as been made about the alleged despite the official respondents reat perception, no steps have e e g o y e . y f d s POONAM RATHORE 2026.07.27 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8921-20
been taken to c that he would b Superintendent o 20.07.2026 (Ann
3. Not
4. At accepts notice on
5. Kee “Lata Singh V. petition is disp Superintendent appropriate actio the life and liber
6. It i Court about the validity of the m
July 27, 2026 poonam
Wh
Wh come to the rescue of the petitio be satisfied if directions are issu of Police, District Fazilka to loo nexure P-5) and take appropriate tice of motion to respondents No the asking of the Court, Mr. n behalf of respondents No. 1 to eping in view the mandate of . State of U.P. and another”, J posed of with a direction t of Police, District Fazilka to on in accordance with law to en rty of the petitioners at the hands s clarified that this order shall n e marriage of the parties and marriage has been expressed in th
hether speaking/ reasoned : hether Reportable :
oners. Learned counsel submits ued to respondent No.2- Senior ok into their representation dated e steps at the earliest.
o. 1 to 3 only. P.S.Pandher, Asst. A.G.Punjab
3. Supreme Court in the case of JT 2006 (6) SC 173, the present to respondent No.2- Senior look into the matter and take nsure that no harm is caused to s of private respondents. not be treated as a stamp of this no opinion with regard to the his order. (H.S.GREWAL)
JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No s r d b f t r e o s e POONAM RATHORE 2026.07.27 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document