Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/36672/2026 of VIKAS TYAGI Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 27 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (208) CRM-M-36672-2026 Decided on: 27.07.2026 Uploaded on: 27.07.2026 Vikas Tyagi ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana ……Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Akash Vashisth & Mr. Akinchan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(208)
CRM-M-36672-2026
Decided on: 27.07.2026
Uploaded on: 27.07.2026
Vikas Tyagi
……Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana
……Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present:
Mr. Akash Vashisth & Mr. Akinchan Aggarwal, Advocates
for the petitioner (s).
Ms. Priyanka Sadar, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
*****
Sumeet Goel (Oral):
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Apprehending his arrest in FIR No.838 dated 04.11.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318 (4) BNS 2023 (later on added Sections 338, 336(3), 340(2), 316(5), 61 BNS, 2023 & 13 (1), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and 66, 66 (c) of the Information Technology Act, 2000), at Police Station City Karnal, District Karnal; the petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail.
2. On 09.07.2026, the following order was passed:
“Apprehending his arrest in FIR No.838 dated 04.11.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318 (4) BNS 2023 (later on added Sections 338, 336(3), 340(2), 316(5), 61 BNS, 2023 & 13 (1), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and 66, 66 (c) of the Information
P a g e | 2
Technology Act, 2000), at Police Station City Karnal, District Karnal; the petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre- arrest bail.
Counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, relies upon the order dated 02.07.2026 passed in CRM-M-33952-2026.
Notice of motion.
On the strength of advance notice; Ms. Mahima Yashpal Singla, Senior DAG, Haryana has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent-State of Haryana.
Adjourned to 27.07.2026.
To be heard alongwith CRM-M-33952-2026.
The petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 14.07.2026 at 11:00 A.M. in concerned Police Station and join investigation. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bond(s) to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. As and when further called by Investigating Officer, the petitioner shall join the investigation. He shall abide by the condition(s) enumerated under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.”
3. Learned State counsel (on instructions) has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation and he is not required for custodial interrogation.
4. Keeping in view the factual milieu of the case in hand, especially the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and he is not required for custodial interrogation, the petition is allowed and the order dated 09.07.2026 granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner is hereby made absolute, subject to the conditions as enumerated under Section 482(2) of BNSS.
5. This order should not be treated as “blanket” order. It will not be read granting petitioner indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be
P a g e | 3
confined to the FIR mentioned ibid and will not operate in respect of any other incident that involves commission of an offence.
6. Liberty is reserved in favour of State/complainant to move for cancellation/recall of this order in case the petitioner violates any condition stipulated under Section 482(2) of BNSS or upon showing any other sufficient cause.
7. Needless to say that anything observed herein above shall not be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case.
8. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off.
(SUMEET GOEL) 27.07.2026
JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No