Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8912/2026 of GRACE AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 27 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 123 GRACE AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Ms. H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 & 3 to
IN THE
AT
GRACE AND A
STATE OF PUN
CORAM: HO
Present:
Ms
H.S. GREWAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Thi Constitution of I the respondent n restrain the priva the petitioners as done nothing wro
2. Le been in a live in been extending th their live in r representation d that the matter w District Bathinda that the petitione Senior Superinte representation an
E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB T CHANDIGARH
CR
Dat ANOTHER
VERSUS
NJAB AND OTHERS ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GR .Mamta, Advocate for Mr.Rishu G
**** , J. (ORAL) is Criminal Writ Petition has bee India, for issuance of a writ in th no.2 & 3 to protect the life and ate respondents No.4 and 5 not to s the petitioners are known to eac ong but are facing threats from re arned counsel for the petitioners n relationship with petitioner No. hreats of dire consequences to the relationship. While drawing th ated 20.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) was reported to respondent No.2- a, Punjab seeking police help but ers would be satisfied if direction endent of Police, District Bathi nd take appropriate steps at the ear
AND HARYANA
RWP-8912-2026 te of Decision: 27.07.2026 ...PETITIONERS ....RESPONDENTS REWAL Garg, Advocate the petitioners. en filed under Article 226 of the he nature of mandamus directing liberty of the petitioners and to o harass or interfere in the life of ch other from a long time and had spondents No.4 and 5. submits that petitioner No.1 has .2. The private respondents have e petitioners as they are averse to he attention of this Court to ), learned counsel has submitted Senior Superintendent of Police, in vain. Learned counsel submits ns are issued to respondent No.2- inda to look into the aforesaid rliest. e g o f d s e o o d , s - d POONAM RATHORE 2026.07.27 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8912-20
3. Not
4. At t notice on behalf
5. In petitioners and w petitioners, the respondent No.2 look into the afo necessary steps, and liberty of t respondents. How action, which cou
6. It is a blanket order o this order shall required in any c
July 27, 2026 poonam
Wh
Wh tice of motion to respondents No. the asking of the Court, Mr. P.S.P of respondents No. 1 to 3. view of the limited prayer ma without commenting upon the sta e present petition is dispo 2-Senior Superintendent of Polic oresaid representation qua the al as may be required, in accordanc the petitioners is not jeopardiz wever, this direction will have n uld be initiated in the matter in ac s made clear that there is no adju of protection from arrest in any F not come in the way if the in cognizable case.
hether speaking/ reasoned : hether Reportable :
1 to 3 only. Pandher, Asst. A.G.Punjab accepts ade by learned counsel for the atus of live in relationship of the osed of with directions to ce, District Bathinda, Punjab to leged threat perception and take ce with law, to ensure that the life zed at the hands of the private no effect on any civil or criminal ccordance with law. udication on merits and this is not FIR. It is further made clear that nterrogation of the petitioners is (H.S.GREWAL)
JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No s e e o o e e e l t t s POONAM RATHORE 2026.07.27 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document