Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/35905/2026 of MANISH KUMAR YADAV Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 27 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

connected cases 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 131+233+237 1. CRM-M-34442-2026 JAGPREET SINGH @ JAGGI .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT 2. CRM-M-30692-2026 MANDEEP SINGH .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT 3. CRM-M-35905-2026

CRM-M-35905-2026 & other connected cases

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

131+233+237

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. CRM-M-34442-2026

JAGPREET SINGH @ JAGGI .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT

2. CRM-M-30692-2026

MANDEEP SINGH .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT

3. CRM-M-35905-2026

MANISH KUMAR YADAV .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT

4. CRM-M-36883-2026

JASHANDEEP SINGH .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT DATE OF DECISION: 27.07.2026 DATE OF UPLOADING: 28.07.2026

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: - Mr. Nandan Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-36883-2026 and CRM-M-34442-2026. Mr. Rajdeep Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-30692-2026. Mr. Angrej Singh Sarwara, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-35905-2026. JATIN 2026.07.28 09:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-35905-2026 & other connected cases

Mr. Hemant Aggarwal, DAG, Punjab. ….. SUMEET GOEL

, J (ORAL)

Present 1st petitions have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS for grant of regular bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.97 dated 29.12.2025 under Sections 109, 118(1), 118(2), 115(2), 351(2), 324(4), 190, 191(3) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023 (Old Sections 307, 324, 326, 323, 506, 424, 425, 427, 148, 149 and 120-B of IPC) registered at Police Station Mehal Kalan, District Barnala.

2. Faced with the situation that the injured namely Shamsher Khan is yet to be examined as a prosecution witness, learned counsels for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present petitions in hand at this stage.

3. Ordered accordingly.

4. It is made clear that in case the statement of above witness is not recorded within a period of three months and the delay is not attributable to the petitioners, the petitioners shall be at liberty to renew their prayer for regular bail.

5. A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of the connected cases.

(SUMEET GOEL) 27.07.2026

JUDGE Jatin Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JATIN 2026.07.28 09:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead