Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8910/2026 of LAKHWINDER SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. on 27 July 2026
(O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN D HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 123 CRWP-8910-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.07.2026 LAKHWINDER SINGH PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN D HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Date of decision: 27.07.2026
LAKHWINDER SINGH
PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Present:
Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Akash Yadav, AAG Punjab.
***
Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeks following reliefs: i) Direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members from respondent No.4. ii) Direction to respondents no.2. and 3 to register FIR against the private respondent, in accordance with law. iii) Direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to conduct an expeditious and impartial probe into the complaint of the petitioner. iv) Direction to official respondents to decide representation dated 10.07.2026 (Annexure P-1), in accordance with law.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.4, who was a craftsman working with the petitioner had been nursing grudge against him as petitioner refused to advance loan of ₹7,00,000/- to him. Respondent No.4 had started disrupting petitioner’s business and reputation and was extending threats. A representation in this regard was moved to respondent No.2-Commissioner of Police, Amritsar but no action was taken.
3. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. HARPREET SINGH CHAUHAN 2026.07.28 10:24 I agree to specified portions of this document
4. Mr. Akash Yadav, AAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that petitioner’s representation (Annexure P-1) had been decided by the ACP-PBI and was consigned to the records on 18.07.2026 as no threat was perceived.
5. In view of the stance of the State, no directions are required to be issued.
6. The petition stands disposed of.
7. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL)
JUDGE 27.07.2026 HS.CHAUHAN Whether Speaking/Reasoned :
Yes/No Whether Reportable :
Yes/No
HARPREET SINGH CHAUHAN 2026.07.28 10:24 I agree to specified portions of this document