Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/4743/2026 of DALJIT KAUR THROUGH SPA AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 27 July 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4743-2026 Date of Decision: 27.07.2026 DALJIT KAUR THROUGH SPA AND OTHERS ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Prince Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-4743-2026 Date of Decision: 27.07.2026 DALJIT KAUR THROUGH SPA AND OTHERS
... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Prince Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Ajay Pal S. Gill, Advocate for respondents No.5 to 9.
**** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the present writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing the official respondent No.1 to 3 for the protection of the life and liberty of the petitioners at the time of cutting/harvesting of wheat crop and until sowing paddy crop in the land owned by the petitioners.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the private respondents are repeatedly interfering in the peaceful possession of the petitioners and in their agricultural pursuits. Therefore, appropriate orders be passed by this Court in terms of the prayer made.
3. The counsel for private respondents, on the other hand, contends that the private respondents are not interfering in the peaceful possession of the petitioners. VISHAL SETHI 2026.07.28 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-4743-2026
4. The counsel for the State, submits that the petitioners were granted protection at the time of cutting/harvesting and sowing of the paddy crop. However, now, some video has been handed over as per which the private respondents are spraying some pesticides on the paddy planted by the petitioners armed with weapons.
5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
6. The present petition is disposed of with the directions to respondent No.2 to personally look into the grievance of the petitioners and proceed in accordance with law.
7. Needless to say, the parties are free to avail their remedies as per Civil Law as well.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE July 27, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No VISHAL SETHI 2026.07.28 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document