Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/39595/2026 of RAHUL @ RITESH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 27 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Rahul @ Ritish State of Punjab Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Uploading:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-39595
IN T IN T IN T IN T
Rahul @ Riti State of Punj
Date of Deci Date of Deci Date of Deci Date of Deci Date of Uplo Date of Uplo Date of Uplo Date of Uplo
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
Present Present Present Present:
SUMEET GO SUMEET GO SUMEET GO SUMEET GO
BNSS, 2023 No.336 date BNS, 2023 a of the Arms the Arms Ac 2023 added l
2. that the petit 21.07.2026 p 5-2026
HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGAR CHANDIGAR CHANDIGAR CHANDIGAR
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-39595
39595-2 ish
versus ab
ision: sion: ision: sion: July July July July 27
27, 2026
oading: oading: oading: oading: July July July July 28, 2026
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUM Mr. D.S. Sobti, Advocate for the (presence marked through video presence marked through video presence marked through video presence marked through video Mr. Adhiraj Singh Thind, AAG Mr. Vishal Deep Goyal, Advoca ***** ***** ***** *****
OEL OEL OEL OEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) Present 2nd petition has been f 3 for grant of anticipatory bail d 18.10.2025, registered under and Sections 25 & 27 of the Arm Act were deleted and Sections ct and Sections 49, 61(2), 308(5) later on), at Police Station Phillau Learned State counsel has brou ioner has been declared as Proc passed by the Sub Divisional Jud
B AND HARYANA AT B AND HARYANA AT B AND HARYANA AT B AND HARYANA AT RH RH RH RH
....Petitioner
....Respondent MEET GOEL MEET GOEL MEET GOEL MEET GOEL e petitioner o-conferencing conferencing conferencing conferencing). Punjab. ate for the complainant. filed under Section 482 of the to the petitioner, in case FIR r Sections 109 and 3(5) of the ms Act, 1959 (Sections 25 and 27 25(1-B)(a), 27(1), 54 and 59 of , 351(3) and 332(b) of the BNS, ur, District Jalandhar (Rural). ught to the notice of this Court claimed Person, vide order dated dicial Magistrate, Phillaur.
r t e R e f , t d MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.28 11:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
CRM CRM CRM CRM-M-39595
39595-2026
3. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition in hand, at this stage, with liberty to file afresh, in case, cause of action so ensues.
4. Ordered accordingly.
5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE July 27 July 27 July 27 July 27, 2026
mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.28 11:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment