Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/40682/2026 of MOHIT Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS on 24 July 2026
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 127 CRM-M-40682-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.07.2026 MOHIT ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: None. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. No one has
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT
CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: 24.07.2026
MOHIT
... PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present:
None.
****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. No one has appeared as lawyers have suspended the work today.
2. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking a direction to respondent No.2 to ensure that respondent No.4 does not interfere with the peaceful use and plying of the petitioner's vehicle bearing registration No. HR-67-D-4777. Petitioner purchased the aforesaid vehicle after obtaining finance from respondent No.4. One instalment is stated to be overdue and the musclemen of respondent No.4 are illegally obstructing the petitioner from plying the vehicle. Petitioner has submitted a representation dated 07.07.2026 to respondent No.2– Superintendent of Police, Panipat, District Panipat.
3. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2– Superintendent of Police, Panipat, District Panipat, to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 07.07.2026 (Annexure P-2) by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period of four SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.24 16:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, and to take appropriate action, if so warranted.
4. However, if, respondent No.2 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law.
5. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 24.07.2026
JUDGE S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.24 16:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document